120.55
ICV 2016
8
MNiSW
 
 

Application of promethee mathematical model for choosing a secondary breakage process of the oversized blocks in limestone quarries

Ahcène Bouhedja 1  ,  
 
1
Université Badji Mokhtar Annaba, Algieria
Mining Science 2016;23:121–135
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
ABSTRACT:
In this article, the study consists in selecting the best of secondary breakage process of oversized blocks with explosives for the limestone quarries. To solve this problem, we propose the centroid weight method for weighting the selection criteria, and the PROMETHEE model as a multicriteria decision making method. A case study is carried out in the limestone quarry of the cement factory of Hadjar-Soud, Algeria.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Ahcène Bouhedja   
University Of Annaba Algeria, Département des Mines, 23000 Annaba, Algeria
 
REFERENCES (44):
1. AFFUL-DADZIE E., KOMINKOVA OPLATKOVA Z., NABARESEH S., 2015. Selecting start-up businesses in a public venture capital financing using fuzzy PROMETHEE. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 60, No. 1, 63–72.
2. AKKAYA G. C., DEMIRELI E., 2010. PROMETHEE ordering method on financial decision process. Ege Academic Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 845–854.
3. ALENCAR L., ALMEIDA A., 2011. Supplier selection based on the PROMETHEE VI multicriteria meth-od. Lecture notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6576, No. 1, 608–618.
4. ALFARES H., DUFFUAA S., 2009. Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 15, No 1, 125–133.
5. ANJOKUMAR L., ILANGKUMARAN M., SASIREKHA V., 2013. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Systems with Application, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2964–2980.
6. APRILIANI D., ADI K., GERNOWO R., 2016. Implementasi metode PROMETHEE dan borda dalam sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan lokasi pembukaan cabang baru bank. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, Vol. 5, No. 2, 145–150.
7. ARUNKUMAR N., GODWIN BARNABAS S., DINESH-KUMAR N., KAMATCHI T., 2012. Facility layout selection for the blood inventory using PROMETHEE II method. International Journal of Engi-neering Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1161–1166.
8. Barron F. H., Barrett B. E. 1996. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights, Management Science, Vol. 42, No 11, 1515–1523.
9. BRANS P., MARESCHAL B., 2002. PROMETHEE-GAIA: Une méthodologie d’aide à la décision en présence de critères multiples, Edition de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles (in French).
10. CHURCHMAN C.W., ACKOFF R.L., 1954. An approximate measure of value, Journal of the Operational Research – Society of America, Vol. 2, No 2, 172–187.
11. CORMON P., 1979. La démolition du béton, Edition Eyrolles, Paris (in French).
12. DE ALMEIDA J.A., DE ALMEIDA A.T., COSTA A P.C.S., 2014. Portfolio selection of information systems projects using PROMETHEE V with c-optimal concept. Pesquisa Operacional, Vol. 34, No. 2, 275–299.
13. DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L.A., 1992. Multi-criteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms, Omega Journal, Vol. 20, No 4, 467–474.
14. DOUBININE N.G., TROUFAKINE N.E., 1971. Variation de la pression des produits de la détonation sur la paroi de la chambre de la charge, Edition Nedra, Moscou (in Russian).
15. EDWARDS W., 1971. Social utilities, engineering economist, Summer Symposium, Vol. 6, No 1, 119–129.
16. EDWARDS W., BARRON F.H., 1994. SMART and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement, Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 60, No 3, 306–325.
17. FLEISS J.L., 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, Wiley, New York.
18. HERMANN K., 1971. Précis de forage, Edition Dunod, Paris ((in French).
19. JIA J., FISHER G.W., DYER J.S., 1998. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of sampling error: a simulation study, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 11, No 2, 85–105.
20. KEENY R.L., RAIFFA H., 1976. Decisions with multiples objectives, Wiley, New York.
21. KENDALL M., 1970. Rank correlation methods, Charles Griffon, 2nd Edition, London.
22. KLEE A.J., 1971. The role of decision models in the evaluation of competing environmental health alterna-tives, Management Science, Vol. 18, No 2, 52–67.
23. KNOLL A.L., ENGELBERG A., 1978. Weighting multiple objectives: the Churchman-Ackoff technique revisited, Computers and Operational Research, Vol. 5, No 1, 165–177.
24. KOVALENKO V., AMBARTSOUMIAN N., LAHMER K.M., 1986. Exploitation des carrières, Office des Publications Universitaires, Alger (in French).
25. LAI Y.J., LIU T.Y., HWANG C.L., 1994. TOPSIS for multiple objectives decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 76, No 1, 486–500.
26. LOMONOSSOV G., 1971. Technologie de destruction des roches dans les carrières, Edition Nedra, Moscou (in Russian).
27. LOOTSMA F.A., 1999. Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
28. NOH J., LEE M.L., 2003. Application of multiattribute decision making methods for the determination of relative significance factor of impact categories, Environmental Management, Vol. 31, No 5, 633–641.
29. OBEREMOK O.H., KLOTCHKO I.I., GONOKHOVA L.V., 1974. Destruction des blocs hors gabarit, Revue Technique, Vol. 29, No 1, 87–90 (in Russian).
30. OLSEN D.L., DORAI V.K., 1992. Implementation of the centroid method of Solymosi and Dombi, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 60, No 1, 117–129.
31. POMEROL J.C., BARBA-ROMEO S., 1993. Choix multicritère dans l’entreprise : principes et pratiques, Edition Hermès, Paris (in French).
32. RIETVELD P., 1989. Using ordinal information in decision making under uncertainty, Systems Analysis, Modelling, Simulation, Vol. 6, No 1, 659–672.
33. ROGERS M., BRUEN M., 1998. A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELEC-TRE III, European Journal of operational Research, Vol. 107, No 3, 552–563.
34. ROY B., 1996. Multi-criteria methodology for decision aiding, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
35. RZHEVSKI V., 1985. Opencast mining-Unit operations, Nedra Edition, Moscow.
36. SAATY T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw Hill, New York.
37. SAATY T.L., 1994. The analytic hierarchy process, Wiley, New York.
38. SOLYMOSI T., DOMBI J., 1985. Method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights, European Journal of operational Research, Vol. 26, No 1, 35–41.
39. SRIVASTAVA J., CONNOLY T., BEACH L.R., 1995. Do ranks suffice? A comparison of alternative weighting approaches in value elicitation, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, No 1, 112–116.
40. STILLWELL W.G., SEAVER D.A., EDWARDS W., 1981. A comparison of weight approximation tech-niques in multiattribute utility decision making, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 28, No 1, 62–77.
41. TIMMERMAN E., 1986. An approach to vendor performance evaluation, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 22, No 4, 2–8.
42. VILA J.M., 1980. La chaine Alpine d’Algérie orientale et des confins Algéro-Tunisiens. Thèse de doctorat d’état, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie, Paris VI (in French).
43. VON WINTERFELDT D., EDWARDS W., 1986. Decision analysis and behavioral research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. ZELENY M., 1982. Multiple criteria decision making, McGraw Hill, New York.
Copy url
Share
 
 
Sign up for email alerts
 
eISSN:2353-5423
ISSN:2300-9586