Preliminary support design for underground mine adit, Artana mine, Kosovo
| 1 | Mitrovica Isa Boletini University
Faculty of Geosciences
Department of Mining Engineering |
| 2 | Trepça Joint-Stock Company, Artana Mine |
| 3 | University of Ljublana
Faculty of Natural Science and Engineering
Department of Geotechnology, Mining and Environment |
| 4 | Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Mining Engineering |
| 5 | Eskişehir Osmangazi University
Faculty of Architecture and Engineering
Department of Mining Engineering |
| 6 | Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Geological Engineering |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Gzim Ibishi
Mitrovica Isa Boletini University Faculty of Geosciences Department of Mining Engineering
Mitrovica Isa Boletini University Faculty of Geosciences Department of Mining Engineering
Mining Science 2021;28:141–159
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this paper, preliminary support design of the main underground opening (i.e., mine adit) located at the Artana lead-zinc mine, Kosovo, was examined by using of empirical and numerical methods for safe underground mine opening design. In order to conduct field studies including discontinuity surveying and sampling for laboratory testing two empirical methods, namely rock mass rating (RMR) and geological strength index (GSI) were employed. For the purpose of determining necessary support units RMR system was utilized. However, empirical design guidelines for underground opening support based on RMR system failed to investigate the performance of support units; therefore, a 2D finite element analysis program was used to assess the performance of the proposed support systems. This indicated that RMR system might not be applicable for poor and very poor rock masses located in deep environment (i.e., 300 and 400 m). Moreover, this is linked to the fact that the RMR system does not consider applied stress. This study showed that when empirical methods are supported by numerical analysis, the preliminary support system design will be much more reliable.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
BAŞARIR H., 2006, Engineering geological studies and tunnel support design at Sulakyurt dam site, Turkey, Engineering Geology, Vol. 86, pp. 225–237.
2.
BAŞARIR H., 2008, Analysis of rock-support interaction using numerical and multiple regression mod-eling, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 45, pp. 1–13.
3.
BIENIAWSKI Z.T., 1973, Engineering classification of jointed rock masses, Civ. Eng. South Africa, Vol. 15, pp. 33–343.
4.
BIENIAWSKI Z.T., 1989, Engineering rock mass classifications: A complete manual for engineers and geologists in Mining, Civil, and Petroleum Engineering, John Willey & Sons, New York, USA.
5.
CARTER P., SNEDDON M., 1997, Comparison of Schmidt hammer, point load and unconfined com-pression tests in carboniferous strata. In: Proceedings of Conference on Rock Engineering, Tyne, England, pp. 197–210.
6.
FABICH S., BAUER J., RAJCZAKOWSKA M., ŚWITOŃ S.P., 2015, Design of the shaft lining and shaft stations for deep polymetallic ore deposits: Victoria Mine case study, Mining Science, Vol. 22, pp. 127–146.
7.
GENIŞ M., BAŞARIR H., ÖZARSLAN A., BILIR E., BALABAN E., 2007, Engineering geological appraisal of the rock masses and preliminary support design, Dorukhan Tunnel, Zonguldak, Turkey, Engineering Geology, Vol. 92, pp. 14–26.
8.
GENIŞ M., ÇOLAK B., 2015, Stability assessment of the Gökgöl karstic cave (Zonguldak, Turkey) by analytical and numerical methods, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 48, pp. 2383–2403.
9.
HOEK E., BROWN E.T., 1980, Underground excavations in rock, Instn. Min. Metall., London.
10.
HOEK E., KAISER P.K., BAWDEN W.F., 1995, Support of underground excavations in hard rock, Balkema, Rotterdam.
11.
HOEK E., MARINOS P., 2000, Predicting squeeze, Tunnels and Tunneling International, pp. 45–51.
12.
HOEK E., CARRANZA-TORRES C., CORKUM, B., 2002, Hoek-Brown failure criterion – 2002 edition. In: Proceedings Borth American Rock Mechanics Society, Toronto.
13.
HOEK E., 2003, Numerical modeling for shallow tunnels in weak rocks, Unpublished notes, www.rocscience.com.
14.
HOEK E., DIEDERICHS M.S., 2006, Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 43, pp. 203–215.
15.
HOEK E., CARRANZA-TORRES C., DIEDERICHS M., CORKUM B., 2008, Integration of geotech-nical and structural design in tunneling: the 2008 Kersten lecture. 56th Annual Geotechnical Engi-neering Conference, University of Minnesota, February.
16.
KHADKA S.S., MASKEY R.K., 2017, Stability analysis and design of rock support for tunnel and cavern of Kathmandu University Geo-lab, Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, Kathmandu University, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
17.
LANGFORD CJ., VALACHOPOULOS N., DIEDERICHS M.S., 2016, Revisiting support optimization at the Driskos tunnel using a quantitative risk approach, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. 147–163.
18.
ÖZSAN A., KARPUZ C., 2000, Preliminary support design for Ankara subway extension tunnel, Engi-neering Geology, Vol. 59, pp. 161–172.
19.
OZDOGAN M.V., YENICE H., GÖNEN A., KARAKUS D., 2018, Optimal support spacing for steel sets: Omerler underground coal mine in Western Turkey, Int. J. Geomech. Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 05017003-12.
20.
POTVIN Y., HADJIGEORGLOU J., 2015, Empirical ground support design of mine drives, In: Proceed-ings of the Int. Seminar on Design Methods in Underground Mining, Australian Centre for Geome-chanics, Perth, pp. 419–430.
21.
RUSNAK J.A., MARK C., 1999, Using the point load test to determine the uniaxial compressive strength of coal measures rock. In: Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, pp. 362–371.
23.
SARI Y.D., GUNHAN PASAMEHMETOGLU A., CETINER E., DONMEZ S., 2008, Numerical analy-sis of a tunnel support design in conjuction with empirical methods, International Journal of Geome-chanics, Vol. 8, pp. 74–81.
24.
SHABANI M., FRANGU S., KARRIQI A., KUÇAJ S., SUKA Q., HALILI H., 2012, Airborne geophysical survey in the region of Artana. 11th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfer-ence and EXPO, Vol. 2, pp. 537–544.
25.
VÁSÁRHELYI B., KOVÁCS D., 2017, Empirical methods of calculating the mechanical parameters of the rock mass, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 39–50.
26.
ZEQIRI K., 2020, Investigation of the mining accidents at “Stan Terg” mine, Mining Science, Vol. 27, pp. 39–46.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.